Document Search
Add To My Bookshelf Sign in or Register Save And Annotate

historical simulation sign in to follow this
subadditivity sign in to follow this
coherent risk measure sign in to follow this
heavy tails sign in to follow this
S&P 500 sign in to follow this
crude sign in to follow this

VaR Methods sign in to follow this
--Parametric sign in to follow this
Discuss This Paper
Sign in to follow this page
Recent Comments
On the Coherency of Historical Simulation (VaR)
Year Of Publication: 2011
Month Of Publication: April
Pages: 24
Download Count: 12
View Count: 1821
Comment Num: 0
Language: English
Source: working paper
Who Can Read: Free
Date: 8-31-2011
Publisher: Administrator
The financial crisis led to uncertainty about the risk regulations set on financial institutions throughout the world. Several studies were undertaken and the overconfidence in mathematical and statistical tools like Value at Risk (VaR) was made a key reason why the crisis was not avoided (FSA, 2009). Artzner et al. (1999) proved that VaR is not a coherent risk measure, as it violates the subadditivity property. The lack of subadditivity could misguide the portfolio manager since the diversification bonus cannot be guaranteed. This paper studies the practical side of the nonecoherency proven by Artzner. By using empirical data from S&P 500 and the oil market during 2000 – 2010, the study covers a highly volatile period and a highly volatile oil market (Hamilton, 2009). The findings are also compared to a theoretical study using Monte Carlo simulations and data provided with a student’s t distribution.
Dahl, Roy Endre Sign in to follow this author
This document's citation network:
Similar Documents:
Close window
Sign up in one step, no personal information required. Already a Member?

Repeat Email:
User Name:
Confirm Password:

Sign Up

Welcome to GloriaMundi!
Thanks for singning up

continue or edit your profile