Document Search
Add To My Bookshelf Sign in or Register Save And Annotate

accuracy sign in to follow this
computational sign in to follow this
time sign in to follow this

VaR Methods sign in to follow this
--Evaluation/Comparison sign in to follow this
Discuss This Paper
Sign in to follow this page
Recent Comments
Evaluating Value at Risk Methodologies: Accuracy versus Computational Time
Company: Journal of Financial Services Research
Company Url: Click here to open
Year Of Publication: 1997
Month Of Publication: October
Pages: 201-241
Download Count: 1389
View Count: 8012
Comment Num: 0
Language: EN
Source: article
Who Can Read: Free
Date: 8-25-2002
Publisher: Administrator
Recent research has shown that different methods of computing Value at Risk (VAR) generate widely varying results, suggesting the choice of VAR method is very important. This paper examines six VAR methods, and compares their computational time requirements and their accuracy when the sole source of inaccuracy is errors in approximating nonlinearity. Simulations using portfolios of foreign exchange options showed fairly wide variation in accuracy and unsurprisingly wide variation in computational time. When the computational time and accuracy of the methods were examined together, four methods were superior to the others. The paper also presents a new method for using order statistics to create confidence intervals for the errors and errors as a percent of true value at risk for each VAR method. This makes it possible to easily interpret the implications of VAR errors for the size of shortfalls or surpluses in a firm's risk based capital.
Pritsker, Matthew Sign in to follow this author
This document's citation network:
Similar Documents:
Documents that cite this work:
Close window
Sign up in one step, no personal information required. Already a Member?

Repeat Email:
User Name:
Confirm Password:

Sign Up

Welcome to GloriaMundi!
Thanks for singning up

continue or edit your profile