Document Search
Add To My Bookshelf Sign in or Register Save And Annotate

bank sign in to follow this
capital sign in to follow this
Canada sign in to follow this
backtesting sign in to follow this
disclosure sign in to follow this

VaR Uses sign in to follow this
--Capital sign in to follow this
Discuss This Paper
Sign in to follow this page
Recent Comments
Do Banks Overstate Their Value-at-Risk?
Company: Simon Fraser University
Year Of Publication: 2006
Month Of Publication: September
Pages: 41
Download Count: 486
View Count:
Comment Num: 0
Language: EN
Who Can Read: Free
Date: 11-26-2006
Publisher: Administrator
This paper is the first empirical study of banks’ risk management systems based on nonanonymousValue-at-Risk (VaR) and profit-and-loss data. Using actual data from the sixlargest Canadian commercial banks, we uncover evidence that banks exhibit a systematicexcess of conservatism in their VaR estimates. Out of the 7,354 trading days analyzed inthis study, there are only two exceptions, i.e., days when the actual loss exceeds thedisclosed VaR, whereas the expected number of exceptions with a 99% VaR is 74. Foreach sample bank, we extract from historical VaRs a risk-overstatement coefficient,ranging between 19% and 79%. We attribute VaR overstatement to several factors,including extreme cautiousness and underestimation of diversification effects whenaggregating VaRs across business lines and/or risk categories. We also discuss the cost ofreporting inflated VaRs in terms of regulatory capital
Perignon, Christophe Sign in to follow this author
Deng, Zi Yin Sign in to follow this author
Wang, Zhi Jun Sign in to follow this author
This document's citation network:
Similar Documents:
Documents that cite this work:
Close window
Sign up in one step, no personal information required. Already a Member?

Repeat Email:
User Name:
Confirm Password:

Sign Up

Welcome to GloriaMundi!
Thanks for singning up

continue or edit your profile